Make your own free website on
Federal Legislation Update
Vote Fix Links
Paper Ballots, Emergency Ballots, All-Mail Voting
Investigation-less election
Voter Registration Rolls Online?
Illegal This But Not That?
Solution or Problem: Federalize Voter Registration for Federal Elections
PA Power Insight
Myth or Fact
Question Them All
"little" Fraud?
Assorted Items
PA Watch
Populism vs PA Constitution
2007 Watch: PA Constitutional Convention
Move toward PA Con-Con
Guidelines for Variety election issues and observing at the Polls
Initiatives and Referendums: Gutting Republicanism
No Voter ID = Passport to Fraud
Illegal Immigrants Voting in U.S. Elections Facts
Goals of HAVA:
Paper Ballot Make It A Voter Choice
PA SB 977 and HB 2000
Both Sides: Electronic Paperless (Selker) vs Paper (Mercuri)
Know It: Second Chance Voting
Holding Breath Will Fayette Purchase Paper Ballot eScan and Electronic eSlate?
Discussion Sites
All laws repugnant void
Activists Absent
Board Discussion
Opinion None of the Above
To Show or Not to Show State Rep. Roberts Phone Calls
Discussion PA Politics 101.2 Media Woke Up to 1 Man Agenda?
Discussion PA Politics 1000.2 PA Clean Sweep's Reform Agenda
Discussion PA Politics 102
Voter Registration Lists
PA Law Changes First Time Voter
Discussion PA Politics 101
Discussion PA Politics 1000.1 Candidates
Lawmakers Arrogance
Blogging Net the Truth Online
Voting Technology 2006
e-Voting Truth
Should taxpayers fund WW2 memorial with religious engravings?
Net the Truth Online About Election Fraud
Issue File Voting by Mail
Powerful Information
Citizen Advisory Group Proposed
Demand PA SURE used
Inspector/s of Voter Registration
Interviews of Note
Motor Voter Law and Deceased
Back to the Future?
John Fund's Political Diary
Year 2000 Highlights Palast Update
Buchanan Vote 2000 Hoax
Fraud 2000: The Confusion
Fraud 2000: Holes
Fraud 2000: The Machines Background
Fraud 2000: Quote of the Millennium
Fraud 2000: Spotlight
Fraud 2000: Undervotes Trail-less
Fraud 2000: Built on the Past
Fraud 2000: Solution in search of Problems
Fraud 2000: Recounting the Ways
Fraud 2000: Dimples
Alert: Fraud 2000
Fraud 2000 Proof
Fraud 2000: Flaws
Fraud 2000: Courts
Fraud 2000: Count and Recount
Fraud 2000: Count and Recount 2
Fraud 2000: Analysis Debate
Fraud 2000: Past to Future
Ballot Fraud of Old
1984 Florida Ballot Problems
Local, State, National Election News
Daily Developments
Voting Fraud Tale Spin
Discussion Internet Free Speech on Trial?
STOP tax reform plan Guts PA Constitution
PA Constitution Doesn't Need Makeover
About Vote Fix
Why Vote Fix Is Up
Security concerns electronic voting
Paper/Opti-scan vs Touch-screen
Voter Confidence/Increased Accessibility Act 2003
Vote Fix Guestbook
PA election reform status
Fayette County Watch
Election 2007 Watch Fayette Politics
United States a republic, not a democracy
Voter Identification (ID) Proof
Citizens Demand Security
Solutions Here
Federal Legislation Update
Testimony HAVA
Net Voting
So Little time
Useful Items
Comments on voting machines
Public Comment on voting machines
Supporting material
Link resources submitted to commishes
Vote Fix Research
Contact/Voice a View
Motor Voter Happenings
Trail of Treachery Chad-Fraud
Fraud 2000: How it went
Fraud 2000: How it Went Then
Trail of Treachery: Varied News & Opinions
Track Vote Fraud

Federal requirements are a concern

Check on legislation in your state which implements key requirements of the Help America Vote Act of 2002

Bill Information Regular Session 2001-2002 Senate Bill 824

Very crucial info
Timeline:  Help America Vote Act Federal election commission
National Governors' Association:

States are subject to civil action, for injunctive or declaratory relief, by the U.S. Department of Justice for failing to meet federal requirements.

The Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the cost to state and local governments of complying with the major requirements of the act will range from $1.7 billion to $3.5 billion over the next several years. States and local governments are required to comply with the act whether or not federal funds are appropriated....

More, including a listing of available grants to the states...

Some of the objections raised are not conducive to fraud-proof elections:
Kathy Bushouse

Many websites have warned that federal legislation pertaining to voting machines contain provisions which are "voluntary."  Beware.

According to the new election reform law, all new federal standards that will be developed and implemented for voting machines will be voluntary. Voting machines can and do malfunction. Voting machine experts say that machines can be easily rigged and impossible to audit. Voting machine companies require buyers to sign contracts granting "proprietary rights" making independent inspection of the machines a violation of the contract. Voting machines that use modems can manipulate voting results during an election from remote locations. Other mechanisms exist to electronically manipulate voting machines before or after an election. Private companies and their technicians appear to control every critical aspect of vote tabulation. There have been reports of voting machine malfunction and concerns about vote rigging by machines since the 1960's. In the midterm election of 2002, pre-election polling data was far off of election results in several states, which has heightened suspicions of election fraud.


Fatally flawed - new election reform law on federal "Voting Systems Standard" HR 3295 - 6th version Comment: The new law as it pertains to voting machine standards is VOLUNTARY.  And, it contradicts itself. It suggests that the voters be able to verify their candidate selection (which is good), but allows voting machines to produce an electronic ballot for voters to "verify" without providing a paper ballot. However, the new law does allow a paper tape produced by the voting machine (but not verified by the voter) to act as the audit trail. Meanwhile, the issue of voting machine company's proprietary rights or trade secrets (which makes any real audit or inspection impossible) was not addressed by the new law.


So, while new federal legislation may be implemented by U.S. Congress, the states will have the flexibility to accept for certification those touch-screen machines which may not have the proper voter-verified paper trail.

Citizens must be aware of what their particular state will certify as of this time, before we allow our local boards of commissioners to approve any new voting machines.

Even more important, what exactly is state certified in your state and in our state NOW?

For your information Check out researcher: Rebecca Mercuri

Google search

March 17, 2003
Ralph F. Boyd, Jr.
Assistant Attorney General
Read this in its entirety - section by section summary of the HAVA.

Be aware of the provisions of Help America Vote Act of 2002
Ask your federal legislators which touch-screen machines are certified by the FEC?  Now, currently.  Are the federal certified machines the kind which have the voter-verified paper trail feature?
Demand your state representatives demand only this type of machine for state certification.
Recent key votes link
Actually, people, it was the "newer" machines in Florida precinct that had the problems, but hey, that's no fun - plus many are just so giggly at the opportunity to squire in an entire new voting system nation-wide that they suppress the reality that it was newer, not older machines.  In fact, in the one Florida county which used the lever style machines, reportedly, there were NO zero 0 problems/errors.  (See Trail of Treachery)
(Voting-machine errors discovered 4 years ago By George Bennett and Marc Caputo, Palm Beach Post Staff Writers Friday, December 8, 2000)
But onward to the Act that imposes what... on the states???
from Melissa Hart site  October 11, 2002 Vol. II, No. 18

No More Hanging with Chad

Last presidential election we saw first hand the effects of an out-of-date election system.  In an effort to prevent similar problems in the future, the House passed the Help America Vote Act of 2001, H.R. 3295.

The legislation authorizes more than $3.7 billion in federal election reforms to replace the punch-card voting systems still used in many voting precincts.  The funding will be used to update equipment, organize and instruct poll workers, provide better access for disabled voters and educate the public about voters rights.  

When voters cannot trust our voting techniques, democracy suffers.  It is the civic duty and privilege of all Americans to vote in elections, and it is our job to ensure that their vote counts.  
from Texas site:
Under Title I of the law, each state can receive a minimum of $5 million in federal funding. The first round of Title I funds, $325 million, will pay for replacing punch-card and lever voting machines with modern voting systems. For each precinct that uses punch-card or lever systems, states can receive a maximum of $4,000 to upgrade.

National Conference of State Legislatures
2003 State Election Reform Legislation
February 26, 2003
National Association of State Election Directors