Make your own free website on
Vote Fix Links
Vote Fix Links
Paper Ballots, Emergency Ballots, All-Mail Voting
Investigation-less election
Voter Registration Rolls Online?
Illegal This But Not That?
Solution or Problem: Federalize Voter Registration for Federal Elections
PA Power Insight
Myth or Fact
Question Them All
"little" Fraud?
Assorted Items
PA Watch
Populism vs PA Constitution
2007 Watch: PA Constitutional Convention
Move toward PA Con-Con
Guidelines for Variety election issues and observing at the Polls
Initiatives and Referendums: Gutting Republicanism
No Voter ID = Passport to Fraud
Illegal Immigrants Voting in U.S. Elections Facts
Goals of HAVA:
Paper Ballot Make It A Voter Choice
PA SB 977 and HB 2000
Both Sides: Electronic Paperless (Selker) vs Paper (Mercuri)
Know It: Second Chance Voting
Holding Breath Will Fayette Purchase Paper Ballot eScan and Electronic eSlate?
Discussion Sites
All laws repugnant void
Activists Absent
Board Discussion
Opinion None of the Above
To Show or Not to Show State Rep. Roberts Phone Calls
Discussion PA Politics 101.2 Media Woke Up to 1 Man Agenda?
Discussion PA Politics 1000.2 PA Clean Sweep's Reform Agenda
Discussion PA Politics 102
Voter Registration Lists
PA Law Changes First Time Voter
Discussion PA Politics 101
Discussion PA Politics 1000.1 Candidates
Lawmakers Arrogance
Blogging Net the Truth Online
Voting Technology 2006
e-Voting Truth
Should taxpayers fund WW2 memorial with religious engravings?
Net the Truth Online About Election Fraud
Issue File Voting by Mail
Powerful Information
Citizen Advisory Group Proposed
Demand PA SURE used
Inspector/s of Voter Registration
Interviews of Note
Motor Voter Law and Deceased
Back to the Future?
John Fund's Political Diary
Year 2000 Highlights Palast Update
Buchanan Vote 2000 Hoax
Fraud 2000: The Confusion
Fraud 2000: Holes
Fraud 2000: The Machines Background
Fraud 2000: Quote of the Millennium
Fraud 2000: Spotlight
Fraud 2000: Undervotes Trail-less
Fraud 2000: Built on the Past
Fraud 2000: Solution in search of Problems
Fraud 2000: Recounting the Ways
Fraud 2000: Dimples
Alert: Fraud 2000
Fraud 2000 Proof
Fraud 2000: Flaws
Fraud 2000: Courts
Fraud 2000: Count and Recount
Fraud 2000: Count and Recount 2
Fraud 2000: Analysis Debate
Fraud 2000: Past to Future
Ballot Fraud of Old
1984 Florida Ballot Problems
Local, State, National Election News
Daily Developments
Voting Fraud Tale Spin
Discussion Internet Free Speech on Trial?
STOP tax reform plan Guts PA Constitution
PA Constitution Doesn't Need Makeover
About Vote Fix
Why Vote Fix Is Up
Security concerns electronic voting
Paper/Opti-scan vs Touch-screen
Voter Confidence/Increased Accessibility Act 2003
Vote Fix Guestbook
PA election reform status
Fayette County Watch
Election 2007 Watch Fayette Politics
United States a republic, not a democracy
Voter Identification (ID) Proof
Citizens Demand Security
Solutions Here
Federal Legislation Update
Testimony HAVA
Net Voting
So Little time
Useful Items
Comments on voting machines
Public Comment on voting machines
Supporting material
Link resources submitted to commishes
Vote Fix Research
Contact/Voice a View
Motor Voter Happenings
Trail of Treachery Chad-Fraud
Fraud 2000: How it went
Fraud 2000: How it Went Then
Trail of Treachery: Varied News & Opinions
Track Vote Fraud


PA Election 2006 results

Lou Dobbs interview voting experts Mar 10, 04 Guests Mark Radke director of marketing Diebold. Rebecca Mercuri Excellent, March 10, 2004 Unfortunately, Senator Hilary Clinton is making this a politically-charged issue, given her remarks about Diebold CEO's prior comments. There is no room or time for this crapola nonsense. Let's obtain machines that are secure - period. I have concerns about a paper trail in which the voter demands being permitted to vote again and again and again. Imagine that mess. There needs to be some sort of verifiability, but not one where the voter gets to "handle" a piece of paper or void a vote after a vote has been cast already. What a mess, somebody is always going to find a loophole and corrupt the voting process. Sad that we have to be ever so watchful that somebody will potentially tamper with smart cards and computerized voting machines.

Joseph Farah
Posted: March 16, 2004
More hot air

electionline updates news links daily

Probe ends with no voter registration fraud found

Some Social Security numbers were flagged this month when they couldn’t be verified.


“I cannot prove whether these individuals made an attempt to illegally register to vote. There’s simply not enough evidence to risk disenfranchising voters in this election.”

Leonard Piazza Election Bureau director

Published: October 21, 2006

WASHINGTON, Oct. 20 — The Supreme Court ruled unanimously late Friday that Arizona could put its new voter-identification rules into effect for the Nov. 7 election while challenges to those rules proceed in the lower federal courts...


electionline report

With elections less than two weeks away, some states have made their rules for fleeing voters clear – cancel the vote if the voter never confirmed their choices – despite criticism from some corners that it disenfranchises a voter.

Last month, Pennsylvania’s Department of State distributed a memo to local election officials stating that the votes of fleeing voters should be cancelled. In the primary, the first time most counties in the state used electronic voting machines, poll workers were given discretion to complete the process for the voter.

Cancelling the votes of someone who registers, shows up at the polls, casts a ballot and leaves because of confusion or some other reason does not make sense to some observers and advocates.

Charles Lewis book Mar 14, 04 Charles Lewis, The Buying of the President, 2004. Guest on C-Span Sunday, March 14, 2004 Disappointed very much in this guest after he admitted he didn't know who Teresa Heinz funds?
What? World Net Daily just had a recent article about Heinz funding organizations which fund That Lewis isn't aware of this is incredible. Lewis lost credibility there.
He further continues the myth that voters in Florida 2000 were disenfranchised - he couches his position like this: "there is some evidence there was quite a mess there.
The state department was dominated by Republicans.
Most of the election commissioners were Democrats, but there wasn't a lot of money spent by the state to educate voters." Well duh, Charles, voters should educate themselves before they go to the polls and make sure their system of voting doesn't throw out a lot of votes if punch cards are poked in two candidate areas.
Lewis ignores the fact that when Bill Clinton and Al Gore captured Florida in 1996, there were many many thousands and hundred of thousands of overvotes. Yet, because the race wasn't close, Clinton/Gore didn't cry that Democrat overvotes then were not counted.
That's the hypocrisy of the argument that votes were not counted in 2000 in Florida. Votes were not counted in 1996 and nobody made a big speech about that. More... will tape the program when it's rebroadcast. Review the book.

Links to Information

Find truth online