votefix
Fraud 2000: Recounting the Ways
Home
Vote Fix Links
Paper Ballots, Emergency Ballots, All-Mail Voting
Investigation-less election
Voter Registration Rolls Online?
Illegal This But Not That?
Solution or Problem: Federalize Voter Registration for Federal Elections
PA Power Insight
Myth or Fact
Question Them All
"little" Fraud?
Assorted Items
PA Watch
Populism vs PA Constitution
2007 Watch: PA Constitutional Convention
Move toward PA Con-Con
Guidelines for Variety election issues and observing at the Polls
Initiatives and Referendums: Gutting Republicanism
No Voter ID = Passport to Fraud
Illegal Immigrants Voting in U.S. Elections Facts
Goals of HAVA:
Paper Ballot Make It A Voter Choice
PA SB 977 and HB 2000
Both Sides: Electronic Paperless (Selker) vs Paper (Mercuri)
Know It: Second Chance Voting
Holding Breath Will Fayette Purchase Paper Ballot eScan and Electronic eSlate?
Discussion Sites
All laws repugnant void
Activists Absent
Board Discussion
Chat
Opinion None of the Above
To Show or Not to Show State Rep. Roberts Phone Calls
Discussion PA Politics 101.2 Media Woke Up to 1 Man Agenda?
Discussion PA Politics 1000.2 PA Clean Sweep's Reform Agenda
Discussion PA Politics 102
Voter Registration Lists
PA Law Changes First Time Voter
Discussion PA Politics 101
Discussion PA Politics 1000.1 Candidates
Lawmakers Arrogance
Blogging Net the Truth Online
Hodgepodge
Voting Technology 2006
e-Voting Truth
Should taxpayers fund WW2 memorial with religious engravings?
Net the Truth Online About Election Fraud
Issue File Voting by Mail
Powerful Information
Citizen Advisory Group Proposed
Demand PA SURE used
Inspector/s of Voter Registration
Interviews of Note
SURE about SURE
Motor Voter Law and Deceased
Back to the Future?
John Fund's Political Diary
Year 2000 Highlights Palast Update
Buchanan Vote 2000 Hoax
Fraud 2000: The Confusion
Fraud 2000: Holes
Fraud 2000: The Machines Background
Fraud 2000: Quote of the Millennium
Fraud 2000: Spotlight
Fraud 2000: Undervotes Trail-less
Fraud 2000: Built on the Past
Fraud 2000: Solution in search of Problems
Fraud 2000: Recounting the Ways
Fraud 2000: Dimples
Alert: Fraud 2000
Fraud 2000 Proof
Fraud 2000: Flaws
Fraud 2000: Courts
Fraud 2000: Count and Recount
Fraud 2000: Count and Recount 2
Fraud 2000: Analysis Debate
Fraud 2000: Past to Future
Ballot Fraud of Old
1984 Florida Ballot Problems
Local, State, National Election News
Daily Developments
Voting Fraud Tale Spin
Discussion Internet Free Speech on Trial?
STOP tax reform plan Guts PA Constitution
PA Constitution Doesn't Need Makeover
About Vote Fix
Why Vote Fix Is Up
Overview
Security concerns electronic voting
Paper/Opti-scan vs Touch-screen
Voter Confidence/Increased Accessibility Act 2003
Vote Fix Guestbook
PA election reform status
Fayette County Watch
Election 2007 Watch Fayette Politics
United States a republic, not a democracy
Suggestions
Voter Identification (ID) Proof
Citizens Demand Security
Solutions Here
Federal Legislation Update
Testimony HAVA
Net Voting
So Little time
Useful Items
Comments on voting machines
Public Comment on voting machines
Supporting material
Link resources submitted to commishes
Vote Fix Research
Contact/Voice a View
Motor Voter Happenings
Trail of Treachery Chad-Fraud
Fraud 2000: How it went
Fraud 2000: How it Went Then
Trail of Treachery: Varied News & Opinions
Track Vote Fraud

Did it happen the way you think?

RECOUNTING THE RECOUNT AGAINScott Jordan


Getting military ballots counted


BEWARE YEAR 2002 (and upcoming for 2004) ELECTION REFORM FOR THE PEOPLE, NOT OF THE PEOPLE (unless you get involved)

Search


Informativewith links


Election legislation disputed in Senate
By Janelle Carter


Election Reform Bill Stalls Over ID Debate
GOP Says Plan Hinders Anti-Fraud Effort
Edward Walsh
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, February 28, 2002; Page A21
Edward Walsh Washington Post Staff Writer Thursday, February 28, 2002; Page A21

TRAIL OF TREACHERY

Approximately 180,000 overvotes and undervotes statewide in Florida! (year 2000)

Truth On-Line has all along asked for the exact number of overvotes and undervotes, and the actual recorded numbers of verified, legally registered voters across the state, county by county.

We stated from the very outset, Day 1 - the numbers keep changing - The media reports usually contain the phrasing "some" 180,000 or "some" 65,000, or "some" 45,000, or "some" 900. They never report actual verified by election officials numbers. Why not? Cause they never ask the kind of questions Truth On-Line would ask.

Nothing has changed - the latest news item concerns the Miami-Herald/ USA Today sponsored hand review of undervotes - not surprisingly the numbers are still not exact!

Bush Would Have Won Recount
NewsMax.com Wires
Thursday, April 5, 2001
After reviewing more than 64,000 ballots in all 67 of Florida's counties, USA Today, the Miami Herald and its parent company, Knight Ridder, said that Bush's 537-vote margin of victory over Democrat Al Gore would have increased to 1,665 votes under the counting standards advocated by Gore.

The study is the first comprehensive review of the "undervote" ballots that were at the center of Florida's disputed presidential election.

The undervotes were ballots on which voting machines did not record a vote.

...USA Today, the Miami Herald and Knight Ridder newspapers hired the national accounting firm BDO Seidman to examine undervote ballots in Florida's 67 counties. The accountants provided a report on what they found on each of the ballots.

The Democrat-dominated Florida Supreme Court ordered Dec. 8 that each of these ballots, which registered no presidential vote when run through counting machines, be examined by hand to determine whether a voter's "intent" could be discerned – even on ballots that were not legal votes. On Dec. 9, the U.S. Supreme Court stopped the hand count before it was completed. That gave Bush Florida's 25 electoral votes, one more than he needed to win the presidency.

Bush Would Have Won Recount NewsMax.com Wires Thursday, April 5, 2001

The Miami-Herald - USA Today hand review recount of undervotes was completed and reported upon April 1, 2001.

The report for the totals of ballots reviewed by the hired firm BDO Seidman were DIFFERENT in the two media accounts!!!

<In fact, a comprehensive review of 64,248 ballots in all 67 Florida counties by The Herald and its parent company, Knight Ridder, in partnership with USA Today, found that Bush's slender margin of 537 votes would have tripled to 1,665 votes under the generous counting standards advocated by Democrat Al Gore.

...The Miami Herald's big recount story published yesterday ...
Wednesday, April 4, 2001
herald Published Wednesday, April 4, 2001

...The study is the first comprehensive review of the 61,195 "undervote" ballots that were at the center of Florida's disputed presidential election.

COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF BALLOTS

64,248 ballots (miami.com/herald) versus 61,195 (usatoday)

Which is it, and how would any number of undervotes compare to the reports based on this chart way back when!

Relive the charting 12/11/00- Florida recount, county by county

In other words, the two media sponsors of the hand review of undervotes COULD NOT REPORT AN ACCURATE NUMBER OF THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF UNDERVOTES TO BE REVIEWED even during this final review of ALL OF THE UNDERVOTES!

Please define - what does all and comprehensive review mean to these people?

If this MAJOR DISCREPANCY isn't worth our attention, now, we shouldn't complain in four years about undervotes - overvotes - illegal votes anywhere in this country, particularly when the numbers won't match in the final, final, end of the recount.

However, this is just the kind of proof we have all along been relaying to show that chad fraud occurred during the Florida hand recount process in 4 Democrat stronghold counties.

There need have been only ONE ALTERED BALLOT during the hand recount in any one of the 4 initial counties chosen by Al Gore and his team to PROVE THAT CHAD FRAUD OCCURRED ON THE PART of the Democrat-controlled canvassing boards in any one of those 4 counties!

Truth On-Line shows that is exactly what occurred during the protest period by the chronology of events that you can follow in TRAIL OF TREACHERY and which is presented to you with resources and links for you to verify the news and media reports.

An opportunity existed for such fraud the moment Ms. Teresa Lapore, or any other Democrat canvassing board member, physically HANDLED A BALLOT, rubbed a finger over tender areas of the ballot, and POTENTIALLY caused either a dent in the ballot that was not there previously, or a hanging chad where a pregnant chad may have been previously to the handling.

There is evidence that is exactly what occurred. But you have to do the homework further to discover for yourself truth available for the delving.

LETTER TO MIAMI-HERALD APRIL 10, 2001

A January 11, 2001 Associated Press announcement published in USA TODAY revealed: USA TODAY has joined an effort by The Miami Herald and its parent company, Knight Ridder, to evaluate the 60,000 undervotes that were central to the disputed presidential election in Florida. The undervotes - ballots on which voting machines registered no vote - will be evaluated by certified public accountants from BDO Seidman, one of the nation's largest accounting firms."

That item referred to "the 60,000" undervotes as the amount to be reviewed in the undertaking by BDO Seidman.

The report concerning the completion of the review of the undervotes by BDO Seidman was noted in the Miami-Herald online and in USA TODAY editions. Published Wednesday, April 4, 2001 the Herald states: " In fact, a comprehensive review of 64,248 ballots in all 67 Florida counties by The Herald and its parent company, Knight Ridder, in partnership with USA Today, found that Bush's slender margin of 537 votes would have tripled to 1,665 votes under the generous counting standards advocated by Democrat Al Gore."

Published Wednesday, April 4, 2001 in USA TODAY: Newspapers' recount shows Bush prevailed in Fla. By Dennis Cauchon, is this statement: "...The study is the first comprehensive review of the 61,195 "undervote" ballots that were at the center of Florida's disputed presidential election."

Truth On-Line contends: any literate person who can comprehend this discrepancy in the amount of actual undervote ballots which were reviewed by BDO Seidman(60,000)(61,195) (64,248) can within mere seconds come to only one conclusion. The entire report is itself fraudulent. What is the actual amount of undervote ballots that BDO Seidman reviewed for the purposes of analysis by the two media conglomerates?

 

Fox exchangehttp://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,27289,00.html

RELEASED ON MONDAY, APRIL 1, 2001, LONG-AWAITED MIAMI-HERALD RECOUNT PRODUCES LOTS OF CROW TO EAT. MAYBE THE RESULTS ARE JUST A HOAX AN APRIL FOOL'S JOKE

UNDERVOTES SUPPORT BUSH WIN

If a manual recount of presidental ballots had gone forward in Miami-Dade County, George W. Bush likely would have won the presidency outright, without weeks of indecision and political warfare, a review of Miami-Dade County's "undervote'' ballots shows.

Al Gore would have netted no more than 49 votes if a manual recount of Miami-Dade's ballots had been completed, according to the review. That would have been 140 too few to overcome Bush's lead, even when joined with Gore gains in Volusia, Palm Beach and Broward counties -- the three other counties where Gore had requested manual recounts.

Miami-heraldUNDERVOTES SUPPORT BUSH WIN

USA TODAY
Newspapers' recount shows Bush prevailed in Fla.
By Dennis Cauchon,
04/04/2001

George W. Bush would have won a hand count of Florida's disputed ballots if the standard advocated by Al Gore had been used, the first full study of the ballots reveals. Bush would have won by 1,665 votes if every dimple, hanging chad and mark on the ballots had been counted as votes, a USA TODAY/Miami Herald/Knight Ridder study shows. The study is the first comprehensive review of the 61,195 "undervote" ballots that were at the center of Florida's disputed presidential election.

COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF BALLOTS

YEP. Comprehensive review. There's still the hype in the write-up, so read with care.

Understand the repurcussions of this true statement - The Florida Supreme Court ordered Dec. 8 that each of these ballots, which registered no presidential vote when run through counting machines, be examined by hand to determine whether a voter's intent could be discerned.

These were the undervotes only that were ordered to be hand reviewed, these were not the overvotes, which contained markings or punches for more than one presidential candidate.

Kausfiles is institutionally committed to maligning the Herald count, but concedes that this is a very useful page of information.

At one point, Pasco County Supervisor of Elections Kurt Browning testified during a hearing that multiple machine recounts in his county produced a different number of undervotes each time.

Nov. 8: 1,776. Dec. 9: 1,712. Feb 5: 1,744.

But it was not machine sorting alone that proved inaccurate. In Duval County, elections officials -- acting under court order -- hand-sorted the county's 291,000 ballots in search of the 4,967 undervotes they had reported on Election Night.

They ended up delivering 5,106 ballots for inspection by The Herald.

That's close, but it also raises the possibility that some of those ballots were actually tabulated in the Election Night machine count.

On the other hand, BDO determined that only 4,880 qualified as undervotes. The other 226 bore marks for at least two presidential candidates, apparent overvotes.

This review did not attempt to inspect overvotes. Florida's Supreme Court order specifically called for the recounting only of undervote ballots, leaving the estimated 110,000 overvotes unaffected.

REVIEW SHOWS BALLOTS SAY BUSH But Gore backers have some points to argue

www.miami.com April 4, 2001

Truth On-Line - still suspicious - the only ones on the Net to show proven chad fraud occurred during the hand review/recounts.

Also keep in mind, that just cause the undervotes from Broward were included in the initial certification, the Bush team did not challenge the validity or illegality of those votes.

To date, we still have not seen a full report concerning how many voters were actually legally registered voters. We provide documentation for everything we're saying. It's here. Keep searching for the truth, even when it hurts!

Miami-Herald Series starting from Wednesday, November 8, 2000

Coverage from Miami.comStill doesn't make Gore win

Miami Herald report reveals Gore would not have gained more net votes in key Democratic win county!

Remember, this was the county which potentially had 10,000 more votes for Gore!

REMEMBER APRIL 1, 2001 - THE DAY THE LEFT HAD TO ADMIT GORE'S A LOSER

Election Reform Information Network (ERIN) Check it out

Check out the comments of businesswoman, Star Parker,

on what "freedom" means. Wow. What a treat - articulate in the extreme and right on the point!

Exploring the ballot racket
Geoff Metcalf interviews vote-fraud activist Victoria Collier
FEBRUARY 18, 2001
FEBRUARY 18, 2001Exploring the ballot racket

Check out Justice Clarence Thomas' comments at American Enterprise Institute's annual dinner Tuesday
Thursday, Feb. 15, 2001
United Press International
Justice Thomas Comes out Swinging
Michael Kirkland
Tuesday's remarks were a defiant response to those who criticize Thomas as an "Uncle Tom," a disparaging phrase used as an epithet against black citizens who promote views shared by mainly white conservatives, and to those blacks who suggest he has betrayed his own race.

In his remarks, Thomas plainly recast his own position and that of other conservatives as one of courage in the face of attack, comparing it to the resistance against Nazism in World War II. The justice cited the case of a Bulgarian official who defied the Nazis and prevented the shipment of Bulgarian Jews to concentration camps.

He also cited John Paul II, another conservative who has "has traveled the entire world challenging tyrants and murderers of all sorts, speaking to millions of people, bringing them a simple single message: 'Be not afraid.'"

Michael KirklandJustice Thomas Comes out Swinging NewsMax.com Wires

Thursday, Feb. 15, 2001
Editor's note: This is the text of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas' lecture Tuesday at the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.

...The Founders warned us that freedom requires constant vigilance, and repeated action. It is said that, when asked what sort of government the Founders had created, Benjamin Franklin replied that they had given us "A Republic, if you can keep it." Today, as in the past, we will need a brave " civic virtue," not a timid civility, to keep our republic. So, this evening, I leave you with the simple exhortation: "Be not afraid."

Text of Justice Thomas' AEI Speech Thursday, Feb. 15, 2001

April 15, 2001

Justice Thomas Defends Founders

BEWARE WHAT YOU ARE ABOUT TO READ MAY MAKE YOU THINK. DO SOME RE-THINKING, TOO.

First on the list:

WHERE DID HARRY BROWNE'S VOTES GO?????

Liberty For All Copy with permission: Exclusive Interview With Frank Longo!
!
Chair: Libertarian Party of Palm Beach County Florida and just elected with over 136,000 votes!

Original Liberty For All http://www.libertyforall.net/frame.html

I heard you on The Zoh Show, and you said Harry Browne's totals have actually gone DOWN?

Frank: In Palm Beach County, the totals I have seen so far have held up with 743. But it was in Volusia County Harry totals went down about I believe 3100 votes if I remember correctly, and he is now down to about 444.

LFA: I WONDER where those went? (LOL)

"The indications are that there is a tremendous amount of fraud..." IN FLORIDA 2000 ELECTION

HERE'S WHAT SOME ARE ALREADY UP TO IN THE AFTERMATH OF ELECTION 2000. TAKE CAREFUL NOTE OF THE CAUTIONARY TESTIMONY BEFORE THE FLORIDA TASK FRAUD COMMISSION, HOWEVER, BY PREZ OF THE ELECTION CENTER.

Microsoft, Dell and Unisys To Create New Voting System

Microsoft, Dell and Unisys To Create New Voting System

January 25, 2001 NA (Network America) e-wire
The Risks Digest: Up to Date Scientific Inquiry on Computers and Elections
January 25, 2001 NA (Network America) e-wire The Risks Digest: Up to Date Scientific Inquiry on Computers and Elections

READ THE FOLLOWING COMMENTARY ON (Network America) NA SITE

Election Officials Are Meeting
NA commentary
Election Systems and Software is the largest company and the very one exposed by free-lance reporter Christopher Bollyn as having two-way modems in their machines. Of course these two Insider companies want us to vote on computer touch screens! There’s no paper trail and no way to check the computer software. If Americans accept this, then we will have to be classified as one of the most apathetic and just plain DUMB peoples in the history of the world. No people has ever had more access to information or more avenues to put pressure on their public officials. Although that pressure needs to take place in the form of THOUSANDS of angry citizens attending county commission meetings and/or Board of Election's meetings and threatening consequences if the public officials BREAK THE LAW and continue imposing unverifiable vote counting systems. That’s what needs to happen, but will it? End of NA Commentary...

Citizens for a Fair Vote Count February 4, 2001

INS involved in voter fraud
80,000-plus criminals naturalized to increase support for Democrats
Kenneth R. Timmerman
© 2001 Western Journalism Center
FEBRUARY 16 2001 INS involved in voter fraud 80,000-plus criminals naturalized to increase support for Democrats

 

Enter supporting content here