In August, the Pennsylvania County Commissioners Association said the state had provided inadequate computer equipment,
software and support for the fledgling system, called the Statewide Uniform Registry of Electors. Association officials said
they were still concerned when they came to the Capitol in January to discuss their legislative agenda.
Doug Hill, the county association's executive director, said that his organization remains committed to developing
the system, but noted that in his conversations with county officials, they have reported "huge problems" with the registry's
operations.
One problem is that it takes up to an hour to print out a report from the system, Hill said. Another problem is
that entering a voter record into the system takes three times as long as it did in any previous system. And when multiple
users are logged onto the system, the delays are even longer.
System computers are also getting a lot of error messages and have problems rebooting, Hill said.
One of the reasons behind the postponement is the impending voter registration deadline before the April 27 primary,
when county offices are flooded with new registration forms, Hill said.
"You get thousands of those on the deadline and you have just a few days to turn it around," he said.
Reviews of the system in the four counties that were the first to use the registry last May were generally unfavorable.
As this point, 13 counties -- Adams, Allegheny, Armstrong, Beaver, Bucks, Butler, Cumberland, Dauphin, Fayette,
Franklin, Greene, Perry and Somerset -- are using the registry as their official system of record for 2.1 million voters,
the state said.
More...
State election officials still plan voter registry
One day after abandoning plans to have a statewide voter registry up and running before the April primary,
state elections officials said Friday they still hope to do so by the presidential election in November.
February 7, 2004 · · Tribune-Review
Excerpt:
HARRISBURG (AP) -- One day after abandoning plans to have a statewide voter registry up and running before the April primary,
state elections officials said Friday they still hope to do so by the presidential election in November.
Only 18 of the state's 67 counties are currently fully participating in the Statewide Uniform Registry of Electors. State
Department spokesman Jesus Pena said officials hope to have about 55 counties connected to the SURE system by the April 27
primary and the rest by the Nov. 2 general election.
The system, which will make it easier for county officials to electronically cross-check and update voter registration
information, has been in the works for more than three years. It predates Florida's 2000 presidential recount fight, which
spawned a 2002 federal law requiring such registries in all states.
County officials have complained since last summer about problems with the SURE system, which will replace the separate
registration systems that most counties still maintain, and expressed skepticism that a statewide registry could be operational
by the 2004 primary. As recently as last week, however, state officials had said they remained committed to that deadline.
But Thursday, Secretary of State Pedro A. Cortes said the deadline had been pushed back to the end of 2004, citing problems
identified in a $78,000 review by a consultant that examined the work of another consultant that holds a $19.5 million contract
to implement the SURE system.
Gov. Ed Rendell said he is concerned about the slow progress on creating the registry, "although I think a lot of states
are having the same problem."
"I am seriously worried that we could have another Florida here in Pennsylvania," he said.
Attempts to reach Cortes on Thursday and Friday were unsuccessful.
James E. McAvoy, a spokesman for Accenture Ltd., a New York firm contracted to oversee the SURE implementation, said all
67 county election offices now have SURE computer equipment and software. Training by Accenture and state officials continues
in those counties that have not yet connected to the system, and they are able to use the equipment to try out what they learn,
he said.
The review of the SURE program by Raleigh, N.C.-based InfoSENTRY Services Inc., ordered in response to the continuing criticism
by county officials, cited shortcomings in Accenture's handling of the SURE project. Accenture responded by charging that
InfoSENTRY applied a different industry standard than Accenture uses and questioning some of the factual findings.
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/search/s_178423.html
More...
SURE system worth the wait
Monday, February 9, 2004
(opinion Valley Independent)
When it comes to reforming the electoral process, major
changes are certainly better late than never.
Of course, on time would have been preferable, but when
dealing with a massive bureaucracy, we'll take what we can get.
Pennsylvania announced last week that it has abandoned
hopes of completing a statewide voter registry in time for the April 27 primary election. That's the bad news.
The good news is that 55 of the state's 67 counties are
expected to be connected to what is being called the SURE system by late April. The rest are planned to be participating by
the general election Nov. 2.
The new system, which is short for Statewide Uniform Registry
of Electors, will give county election officials the ability to electronically cross check and update voter registration information.
The push to get the process in place began three years ago, even before the hotly contested presidential recount fight in
Florida.
Four counties actually tried out the new system during
the 2003 primary. Reports were mixed and bugs had to be worked out, but the overall feeling was that the system gets easier
with practice.
As recently as the beginning of February, state officials
expressed hope that the April 27 deadline could be met. However, a few remaining problems forced that goal to be pushed back
to the fall.
In this case, we don't mind the government delay. Public
trust in elections is such an important issue -- one that has been tested by the Florida recounts and other recent incidents
-- that we want to see the elections officials take their time and get it right.
Every time election season rolls around, we hear jokes
about people voting multiple times or a candidate getting heavy support from the graveyards. Not only are those jokes not
particularly funny, they undermine public confidence in our elections system, which is the backbone of a democracy.
The system needs to be fixed. Registration lists must be
updated and purged to make sure that only living, breathing, eligible voters are allowed to cast their ballots.
We are confident that the SURE system will push Pennsylvania
in that direction. So to election officials we say, take your time, but get it right.
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/search/s_178692.html
I can't disagree with anything said in the viewpoint. However, the counties that now have
this tool in place should not be held back by counties which are having glitches.
Get the voter registration rolls clean now.