Make your own free website on Tripod.com
Not Enough Said
Report PA School Consolidation Cost Effectiveness
Home
Blog Posts for April 2011
Blog Posts for May 2011
Blog Posts for June 2011
Blog Posts for July 2011
Blog posts for August 2011
Blog Posts for September 2011
Radio Talk Show Host Fails to Study School Consolidation for Fayette County Study
Not Enough Said project of: Net the Truth Online
Rep. Mahoney Reading Not Enough Said? Poses Study Could Show No Savings by Admin. Consolidation?
Fayette Special: Model for Other Power Grabbing PA State Legislators to Follow
PA Rep. Tim Mahoney Proposal to House Education Cmte Shows Goal To Wrest Local Control
County-wide School District Legislation Allows Board of Commissioners Authority to Equalize District
Not Enough Said on This Issue Site per Proposal for Fayette Vo-Tech/STEM Center
Confirmation Why Herald-Standard Didn't Question Rep. About His Advisory Committee
Plan for Countywide School District Consolidation = Fayette Forward Strategic Plan
Report PA School Consolidation Cost Effectiveness
Rep. Mahoney Claims After Consolidation Savings 15% to 20% Where We Ask?
Is Rep. Tim Mahoney About to Change Structure of School Administration All on His Own?
Herald-Standard & Rep. Tim Mahoney in League to Bait & Switch Public
Candidates for School Directors On the Fence or Supportive Urged to View Wealth of Critical Studies
Herald-Standard Disappointed School Board Candidates Not All Rosey County Consolidation
Study: consolidation of school districts into larger units leads to higher dropout rate!
We Can Hear It Now Some of my Opponents Don't Want The People To Decide
We Can Hear it Now: Are You Against the People Deciding Consolidation Choice
Report PA School Boards Association Study on Consolidation 2009
Cost Savings Claimed 2 Years Before Local Study Begins Now Claim Lowered!
Bid Process? Study Weighted to Cost-Savings Due to Results for Center & Monaca Consolidations?
Does Consolidation into Large District Save Costs?
Did Merged Districts Hold True to Standard & Poor Study: Taxes May Rise in 1 District
Merged Monaca & Center School Districts Less than 2,999 Students!
First Eliminate School Property Taxes, Candidate Says, Then We'll See @ Consolidation?
Central Valley School District: Archetype for (Fayette) County-wide Consolidation?
What is the Impact of Consolidation (into larger district) on Students?
What is the Impact of Consolidation (into larger district) on Rural Community?
No Public Referendum Required for Two or More School Districts to Merge
PA Economy League Report Municipal and School District Functional Mergers & Structural Consolidation
Experts Slam Consolidation Small/Medium Size Districts into Larger One
Not Enough Said Requests Talk Show Host Read Standard & Poor Study
Legislation Designed to Enable Boards of County Commissioners Power to Place Measure on Ballot
Article: PA Legislators Push Plans for School Consolidation
Fayette School Director Candidates Take Opposing View of Countywide Consolidation Plan
Get It Spot On and Don't Cover Up When You Don't
Unified Countywide School District for "Taxation Purposes"
Uniformity in the Course of Study in the Schools of the Several Grades
Rep. Mahoney Meets With Herald Standard Editorial Board
PA Dept. of Ed. Retirees Now Education Management Group Consultants to Conduct Study
Promise Local Sub-districts in Countywide School Retain Local Identity
Book of Quotes by Not Enough Said
Links per county-wide school consolidation issue
Contact Me
Stop Uniform Curriculum County-Wide School Consolidation Power Grab
Fayette County Commissioner Candidates Responses to School Regionalization Question
Tribune-Review article per PA school consolidation legislation
Article: Region to Benefit from 2 New STEM Education Centers
Herald-Standard Article: Unity between Business and Education Needed in Fayette County
Marcellus Shale Gas Program of Interest Not an Endorsement
Radio Talk Show Host: Gas Impact Concerns Citizens Demand DEP Resolve
Votefix will be providing an update soon

Standard and Poor's Study on the Cost Effectiveness of Consolidating Pennsylvania School Districts commissioned by the PA state Legislative Budget and Finance Committee June 2007

Not Enough Said:

Senate Resolution 2006-208 directed the LB&FC to study the cost-effectiveness of consolidating Pennsylva-nia school districts. The LB&FC contracted with Standard & Poor’s to conduct this study. The report is in two volumes: Volume 1 provides a statewide analysis of issues involved in consolidating school districts and Volume 2 provides detail on 97 possible district consolidations across the Commonwealth.

  1. School districts with enrollments of between 2,500 and 2,999 students tend to have the lowest per pupil costs. Very small districts (fewer than 500 students) spend an average of $9,674 per pupil in operating costs. Per pupil spending tends to de-crease until it reaches an average of $8,057 among districts with 2,500-2,999 students. As shown in the graph below, per student spending tends to go back up again as enrollments exceed 3,000 students.

Districts’ Per-Pupil Operating Spending by Enrollment (2004)

  1. 97 pairs of districts were identified as poten-tial candidates for consolidation. S&P identified 88 small school districts with above-average costs that could be paired with a contiguous district, yielding 97 possible pairings with combined enrollments below 3,000 students. Some districts were included in more than one pair; 34 mutually exclusive pairs could save approximately $81 mil-lion annually in operating costs if, after consolidat-ing, they could lower their per-pupil cost to the av-erage amount spent by similarly-sized districts across the state.
  2. Even if cost savings could be assured, consol-idations would be controversial. S&P surveyed the superintendents of districts identified as poten-tial consolidation candidates. Although 61% of those responding indicated a willingness to consider consolidating, many indicated that such an effort would face considerable opposition in their com-munities. Reasons include socio-economic and de-mographic differences between school districts, the potential for longer bus routes for school children, loss of local control, loss of local identity, and re-cent investments in facility improvements that can create a disincentive to close those schools.
  3. Many key factors in a consolidation decision can only be analyzed on a case-by-case basis. Because districts vary so widely, it is not possible to establish firm statewide consolidation criteria. Key factors that need to be considered include:
  4. Property taxes. A consolidated district, even if it results in overall savings, may cause one of the merging district’s taxes to rise.
  5. Transportation. The maximum time most communities are willing to let their students sit on a bus one-way is one hour, which presents a significant challenge for consolidation, particu-larly in rural districts.
  6. Neighborhood schools. Many parents are strongly attached to their local schools, particu-larly at the elementary level, making it very dif-ficult to close these schools even if closing represents a good opportunity for cost savings.
  7. Consolidation could yield academic enrich-ment opportunities. 63% of responding small-district superintendents agreed that consolidation could provide academic enrichment opportunities for their students; 51% thought consolidation could offer additional extra-curricular opportunities.
  8. Sharing services can yield savings without consolidating districts. Many districts already share services with other districts and, in some cas-es, with local municipalities. The PA Dept. of Gen-eral Services also has programs that give districts the ability to increase their purchasing power.
  9. NCLB could be an obstacle to consolidation. Federal No Child Left Behind legislation holds dis-tricts accountable for making Adequate Yearly Progress toward their proficiency goals. This could be a disincentive for a higher-performing district to merge with a lower-performing district.

For a full copy of the report, call 717-783-1600, e-mail us at info@lbfc.legis.state.pa.us, or download at http://lbfc.legis.state.pa.us. June 13, 2007

Not Enough Said:

Standard and Poor's Study on the Cost-Effectiveness of Consolidating Pennsylvania School Districts Report Highlights offers the following in its highlights

Sharing services can yield savings without consolidating districts. Many districts already share services with other districts and, in some cases, with local municipalities. The PA Dept. of General Services also has programs that give districts the ability to increase their purchasing power.

http://lbfc.legis.state.pa.us/

 

 

Not Enough Said

dare 4 liberty

Not Enough Said got a start in early May  2011

Net the Truth Online and Dare Inquire Representatives Truth  remain current sites that preceded this site.
 

Notenough Said

Create Your Badge

site devoted to revealing half-truths or untruths, distortions... finding political motivations among elected officials and putting them on display...